Caribbean Natural Resources Institute (CANARI)
Discussions are in full swing at the Third International Conference on Small Island Developing States, including the need for greater civil society involvement.
The first day of the Third International Conference on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) was HOT! Delegates sweated as they rushed to catch buses, walk from taxi drop-off points located what seemed like miles away from the entrance, and moved in between sessions and side events being held in open tents in the midday heat. But the issues to be discussed were also hot. The official outcome document of the Conference - the SAMOA Pathway - had for the first time been negotiated in advance. With the long list of 17 sustainable development issues and text agreed upon, the underlying focus therefore seemed to be on positioning SIDS with strong political statements and sharing experiences on some of the "hot" issues.
The tone was set early on by the President of the Conference, the Prime Minister of Samoa, during the formal opening when he opined, "we should send bold signals on what we can do, not what others can do for us" and "sympathy and pity will not provide solace nor halt the disastrous impacts of climate change." Although issues of the fragility and vulnerability of SIDS continued to be raised, international partners have tired of this message. So, throughout the conference, SIDS have been asserting what actions they are undertaking and calling for stronger actions by development partners.
The theme of the conference is on partnerships, and a series of "Partnership Dialogues" are being held where governments, UN agencies, and others are promoting new or existing partnerships. The main focus is on the strategic opportunity to develop new partnerships with the private sector for resourcing sustainable development initiatives.
We in civil society, which has of course long played a role in sustainable development and has the potential to play an even more effective role, feel marginalised by this new focus on private sector. The strategic role of civil society is not really recognised in the SAMOA Pathway. A representative of the nine Major Groups recognised by the UN, which includes civil society, made a statement at the opening on behalf of the over 250 representatives who gathered at the Major Groups Forum held the previous week. The statement laid out key principles on partnerships, drawing from a paper prepared by CANARI. It also called on governments to implement a strong human rights and sustainable development framework and a people-centred approach. Major Groups recognised the core of sustainable development as human rights, gender equality, economic justice, and environmental sustainability.
Given the diversity across the nine Major Groups recognised by the UN system, very wide ranging priorities were identified which largely mirrored those identified in the official SAMOA Pathway, for example calling for urgent and ambitious action on climate change. However, Major Groups were more ambitious on controversial issues, for example making a strong statement on sexual and reproductive health and rights. Major Groups were disappointed at the lack of attention paid to the role of civil society and the needs of indigenous people in the SAMOA Pathway and highlighted these in their list of priorities.
Also in the opening, the UN Secretary General noted concerns that SIDS are not on track on terms of achieving sustainable development targets, and that some are even regressing. The President of the General Assembly noted that SIDS and their partners need to assert their priorities and make sure that these are reflected in the new post-2015 global development agenda being negotiated. Samoa is very much being seen as a strategic opportunity for SIDS to prepare to advocate their priorities in the post-2015 process and climate change negotiations in late 2014.
The blog contains the authors’ personal views and does not represent the view of IRF. IRF accepts no liability for your use of or reliance on information found on the blog. IRF does not edit and is therefore not responsible for any comments, but reserves the right to review/remove any comment at any time. If you wish to report a comment for any reason, please contact us or flag the comment on the comments system.